← Search

Caitlin Roth

Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 22W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Roth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Estey 8.0 - 2026 Summer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Klenton Willis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Yes We Khan RAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Estey 8.0 - 2026 Summer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Warden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Yes We Khan RAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Kruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Kruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Yes We Khan RAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Kruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · Yes We Khan RAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Kruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · Estey 8.0 - 2026 Summer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Warden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 71.2% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert