← Search

Lisa Teske

— year-end
31 matches · 13W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lisa Teske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · Acers Hagy RTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Couser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Cerhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mabel Ryder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Lembach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Teske - Golden Girls of Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Acers Hagy RTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Obert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Lembach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-26 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Palen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.3% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal