← Search

Maggie Wheeler

— year-end
34 matches · 17W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Maggie Wheeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-09-14 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-07 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Hassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · KHeidkamp (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Heidkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Troppmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brandi Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · JCook/Weaver (PCC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Leavitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-20 · RChow (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stenersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Troppmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · RChow (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.5% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams