← Search

Maggie Webb

— year-end
92 matches · 54W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Maggie Webb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-09-14 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Troppmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · KHeidkamp (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandi Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-17 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandi Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · KHeidkamp (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Heidkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · BMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Hua Shaul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · KHeidkamp (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Troppmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · KHeidkamp (PCC) · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-05 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ashley Sofsian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristin Heidkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · CAckels (Providence CC) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 52% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.4% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal