← Search

Joe Belnap

Idaho Falls, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 119W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe Belnap to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
W
2026-09-09 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amie Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amie Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-31 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amie Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amie Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Hulse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Hulse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Hulse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Hulse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Hulse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Hinkson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cory Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · BROWNIES BUNCH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Hinkson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Belnap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
53.8%
50W–43L · 52.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 60.9% of games
7.5mixed
67.6%
23W–11L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
19.2%
5W–21L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe