← Search

Amie Belnap

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 111W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amie Belnap to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Hulse's Heroes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · Hulse's Heroes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-03 · Hulse's Heroes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-31 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · The Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Belnap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-01 · Wonder Women · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · Belnap · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.5% of games
3.5
47.6%
30W–33L · 51.3% of games
4.0
10.3%
4W–35L · 33% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 63.2% of games
6.5mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
70%
21W–9L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
20%
5W–20L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
76 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams