← Search

Brooklyn Meadows

Pensacola, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 23W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brooklyn Meadows to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Will Spencer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-10 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Minschwaner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Minschwaner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Andresen - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonna Wheat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · Tan - SHL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherie Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Tan - SHL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherie Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-17 · Andresen - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thuy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
Tori Baker / Julie Reed
2026-06-08 · Tan - SHL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Van Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Camille Neuner / Jill Kunkel
2026-05-19 · Tan - SHL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherie Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Andresen - RS Clay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · Tan - SHL · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-12 · Escambia/Tan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abigail Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.9% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova