← Search

Heidi Baughman

Dublin, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 41W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Baughman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-04-17 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Dabbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-29 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-20 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · Wedgewood · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-07 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Maureen Allison / Tiffany Taylor
2025-10-03 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-26 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.9% of games
3.5
36.5%
23W–40L · 44.9% of games
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova