← Search

Carol Roy

Dublin, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 43W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Roy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
Lindsay Anderson / Melissa Barnett
2026-01-09 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Wible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-12-19 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-12 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Wible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-03 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Boudreau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-21 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-11-19 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allison Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-07 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Baughman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-31 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Wible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-29 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Megan Brown / Toni Block
2025-10-24 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2025-10-22 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-10 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Haddow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36%
9W–16L · 43.9% of games
3.5
40%
26W–39L · 44% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.6% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 44.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe