← Search

Danielle Martines

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 92W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle Martines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-09-01 · LTFC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Garbiso Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Jaggers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · LTFC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsi Darnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · LTFC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kaori Dowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Jaggers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Jaggers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · LTFC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · LTFC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Bendalin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · LTFC PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristina Denezza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · LTFC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Nam Luu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Nam Luu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
58.9%
56W–39L · 55.4% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.3% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.8% of games
8.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 52.6% of games
8.5mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert