← Search

Chelsea Ye

Greenwood Village, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 100W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Ye to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-09-01 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Sachs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Navraj Heer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Mauro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juliet Beckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Navraj Heer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Deline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Edward Su mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten Handler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Barnacle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle McDonough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
46%
52W–61L · 49.1% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 53.9% of games
8.5mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 48.1% of games
9.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 50% of games
9.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova