← Search

Emily Callahan

Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Callahan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Da.Wilder18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Anastasiya Manet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Da.Wilder18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Heidi Steiber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-20 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lorraine Bowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Le.Boesch18A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-13 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Smita Paranjape
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Le.Boesch18A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-29 · Le.Boesch18A · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.5% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.5
25%
2W–6L · 34.3% of games
10.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#2 Singles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova