← Search

Heidi Ross

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
348 matches · 219W–129L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Heidi Ross to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history348 matches
W
2026-09-08 · TPerrone.40C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Then
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-04 · JRoss.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janelle Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Ratliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ana Plachco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · TPerrone.40C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelli Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Susan Omell / Connie Kim
2026-08-15 · MCP.Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Loralie Bible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · APlachco.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Sirivolu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · LBuyaki-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Remco Laan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · MCP.Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Stanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Cary Armstrong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
71.5%
108W–43L · 57.9% of games
4.5
45%
18W–22L · 49.7% of games
7.5
54.3%
25W–21L · 53.6% of games
8.5
57.5%
23W–17L · 55.5% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
134 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
98 matches
#2 Singles
1%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert