← Search

Mary Jane Swalberg

— year-end
306 matches · 85W–221L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Jane Swalberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
L
2026-09-08 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Harman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-31 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kaye Moulding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pettit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaye Moulding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with LISA PERMENTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Teams72 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
39.3%
59W–91L · 45.5% of games
3.5
7.2%
7W–90L · 27.8% of games
6.0
37.8%
17W–28L · 43.8% of games
5.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 34.5% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
33 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal