← Search

Rebecca Harman

— year-end
605 matches · 276W–329L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Harman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history605 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Tennis Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyra Dunshee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jane Swalberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pettit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyra Dunshee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Tennis Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lili Leiataua Iosefa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · Tennis Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lili Leiataua Iosefa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Utah Valley Gals · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Tennis Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyra Dunshee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Shirley Johnson / Becky Nelson
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Natasha Plyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Natasha Plyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams106 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56.8%
154W–117L · 53.9% of games
3.5
28.9%
65W–160L · 41% of games
6.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 50.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.7% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.4% of games
6.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
222 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
206 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
115 matches
#1 Singles
3%
17 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe