Martha Davis
514 matches · 352W–162L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Martha Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history514 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-0, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Susan Johnson / Soraya McTeague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6, 0-1
Teams120 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 1.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 1Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA S TriWHi 2.Tam Wright Sun 5 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 6.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 5.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 4.MTB Witte Sun 2 $27
CDTA W TriWHi 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 85CWc Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 85CWa Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.5%
216W–86L · 57% of games
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 52% of games
7.5
66.7%
32W–16L · 57.7% of games
8.5
66.1%
41W–21L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
71%
22W–9L · 55.5% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
237 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
186 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
91 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.