Nancy Cushing
355 matches · 238W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Nancy Cushing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history355 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams83 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 4 $25
CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 4.NTC Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA S 55&OW9.0 2.NTC DeMari Thu 7 $24
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 1.Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/Odenbeck
NITA E 40W40f Score-Knutte/Odenbeck
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.9%
116W–41L · 58.4% of games
4.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 52.8% of games
7.5
87.5%
42W–6L · 64.4% of games
8.0
64.5%
40W–22L · 56.8% of games
8.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 47.7% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 59% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
185 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
111 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
59 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.