← Search

Kathleen Ericksen

BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 33W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Ericksen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Neigel (BAIN) Topspin Drift · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-06-25 · Neigel (BAIN) Topspin Drift · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexis Neigel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Neigel (BAIN) Topspin Drift · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lissa Dashe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-02 · BAIN-Wiggins · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-20 · Prekeges · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Pamela Olson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
2025-08-20 · Prekeges · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 61.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 38% of games
0.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
15%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer