← Search

Rachel Wallach

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 88W–78L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Rachel Wallach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Rachel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · NWW-HBSQ-Hoy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irving Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-03 · Rachel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Dangerously Mediocre · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Dangerously Mediocre · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · NWW-HBSQ-Hoy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irving Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · FC-Waldron · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Dangerously Mediocre · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Lina Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · HBSQ-Net Results Will Vary-Hoy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.8%
37W–21L · 55.9% of games
3.5
37%
17W–29L · 46.6% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert