← Search

Cindy Bramble

Frankfort, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 50W–81L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cindy Bramble to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-09-03 · KY/LEX/Wickline/Coy · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · KY/LEX/Wickline/Coy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Hollon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Faulconer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/MARTIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Shuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/MARTIN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Holsclaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lily Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Faulconer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Pat Miller / Sarah Owens
2026-03-27 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Faulconer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-18 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Stich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
47.9%
35W–38L · 48.6% of games
4.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 23.3% of games
7.5
45%
9W–11L · 49% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams