← Search

Anne Faulconer

Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 73W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Anne Faulconer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-09-03 · KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Pernice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nickels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ched Crouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-27 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bianca Bulnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Bramble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · KY/LOU/DICKS/WOODS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lana McIntyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Bramble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Hollon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-30 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
78.8%
52W–14L · 61.7% of games
4.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 31.1% of games
7.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 57.8% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games
4.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 59.1% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe