← Search

Lisa Newell

— year-end
319 matches · 196W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history319 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Gould/Zeigler · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Zeigler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · Gould/Zeigler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Gina-Marie Weiss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Eileen Allers / Grace Smith
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Kathy Rey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with SHASHA CAI championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · HIT/PW, Newell/Imberman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seema Imberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · HIT, Newell/Banks (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
L
2026-07-21 · HIT, Newell/Banks (D) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · LI: Huntington, Newell · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Neuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · Gould/Zeigler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · HIT/PW, Newell/Imberman · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seema Imberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · HIT, Newell/Banks (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marisol Scherr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams76 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.2%
120W–56L · 57.2% of games
4.5
20%
10W–40L · 37.8% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.6% of games
8.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 68.1% of games
8.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
33 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe