← Search

Barbara Rhoads

Saint Charles, MO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 40W–66L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Barbara Rhoads to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Rhoads-Waaler (F) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jamie Waaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Mowery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frederick Eason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Mowery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · Rhoads · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Bain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Rhoads · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Lomax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · 40-Love (Rhoads) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Mowery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · Rhoads 3.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Rhoads 2.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kendra Worsham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-06 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte French
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · STL/Rhoads/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erin Kirwan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · Rhoads 2.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rachel Forst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.2% of games
3.0
30.5%
18W–41L · 43.6% of games
6.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer