← Search

Lisa Eckenrodt

— year-end
237 matches · 166W–71L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Lisa Eckenrodt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Peterson-Strasheim (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Dalton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Sue Adams / Karen Walker
2026-09-12 · Burkart/Rechtlich · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cara Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zach Weil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe de Marco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wesley Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Peterson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wesley Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe de Marco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-07 · Raising a Racquet (Henze) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Henze mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-01 · Peterson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Peterson/Moore (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristina Jaggers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · Peterson/Moore (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Strasheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
140W–56L · 58.5% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 61.2% of games
6.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer