Elizabeth Biscan
Lemont, IL
67 matches · 43W–24L · seasons 2019–2023
Captains: add Elizabeth Biscan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history67 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2023
CDTA E 18&O W4.5 Lake Bluff Cal Sat 6 $20
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 a.Lake Bluff Cal Thur 7 $20
IL/A40&O 4.5W/Stenmark Seaman
NITA E 45W40a Glenbrook RC (Stenmark)
NITA S TLWd Vaughan (McClure/McTeague)
NITA W 45TLWb Vaughan (McClure/McTeague)
CDTA S 18&O 4.5W Lake Bluff Cal Wed 7 $20
NITA 45W40 Naperville TC (Richards/Demari)
NITA E 45W40c Naperville TC (Richards/DeMari)
CDTA 18&O W/E 4.5W Naperville Preston Sat 9 $20
NITA E 45W40a Rush Copley (Adams)
NITA W 45W40b Rush Copley (Adams)
NITA W 85CWa Rush Copley (Adams)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
72.9%
35W–13L · 59% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
35 matches
#1 Singles
18%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.