Christine Meade
Chicago, IL
459 matches · 279W–180L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Christine Meade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history459 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams101 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 1.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CHI E 40W4.5 4.NBRC Burns Sat 3 $30
CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 4Cent Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30
CDTA E M18&O9.0 4RT Stenmark Fri 7:30 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Mon 7 $
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA S M40&O9.0 1.RT Stenmark Sun 10 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W M18&O9.0 5.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $27
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
MRC 4.5 Tennis
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
68.8%
106W–48L · 59% of games
4.5
54%
47W–40L · 52.8% of games
7.5
60%
15W–10L · 53.3% of games
8.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
59.2%
29W–20L · 54.8% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
48.8%
20W–21L · 50.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
183 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
145 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
106 matches
#1 Singles
5%
22 matches
#2 Singles
0%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.