← Search

Kathy Barnett

— year-end
65 matches · 23W–42L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Kathy Barnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-25 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Oakwood - Blake · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christie Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Lott Park - Blomeyer · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elaine Weil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Lott Park - Blomeyer · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · Lott Park - Blomeyer · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elaine Weil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · Oakwood - Blake · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · Lott Park - Blomeyer · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Khanh Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-24 · Oakwood - Agagan/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Rudisill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-03 · Oakwood - Agagan/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Presley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-20 · Oakwood - Agagan/Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
38%
19W–31L · 47.8% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova