← Search

RENEE VANDEGRIEND

Hood River, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 41W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add RENEE VANDEGRIEND to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-03-27 · RvdG · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-2
L
2026-03-08 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-28 · VTC-Griffith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Kjos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-10 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-17 · RvdG · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-15 · RvdG · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · VTC-Pluymers/Pickering · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Karlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-28 · VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Loomis-Malin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Kazangian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · with David Sturdyvin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-09-14 · vandeGriend · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-13 · VTC-Pluymers/Pickering · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Karlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.8% of games
4.0
15%
9W–51L · 32.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
27.3%
6W–16L · 39.8% of games
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#2 Singles
10%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer