← Search

Tracy Earls

— year-end
336 matches · 192W–144L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tracy Earls to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history336 matches
W
Andrea Davis / Kimberly KnifeChief
2026-09-02 · Wilburn/GR/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Carabello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · Evans/GR/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Carabello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-30 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Matthew Maddern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with William Waggoner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · Cook/LF/day tri 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melinda Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Matthew Maddern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Cook/LF/day tri 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Foust/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dana Dudley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Evans/GR/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eden Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Cook/LF/day tri 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Estelle Berlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Evans/GR 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Logan Banfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Cook/LF/day tri 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Teams73 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
62.3%
48W–29L · 53.2% of games
3.5
64.8%
92W–50L · 55.1% of games
4.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.6% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.1% of games
5.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
52.5%
31W–28L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer