← Search

Dana Dudley

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
278 matches · 166W–112L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dana Dudley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history278 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheilah Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-28 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monty Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Alexander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monty Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Foust/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Estelle Berlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · Foust/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tracy Earls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monty Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Foust/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Estelle Berlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monty Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Casillas/LF 55s 6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monty Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Peterson/Lf 55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tami Foust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.1% of games
3.0
81.6%
31W–7L · 60.4% of games
3.5
67.6%
73W–35L · 56% of games
4.0
31%
9W–20L · 39% of games
6.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.3% of games
7.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
45 matches
#2 Singles
13%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer