← Search

AMY SITZE

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 82W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add AMY SITZE to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-08-31 · DTP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robyn Frahm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · GTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · DTP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Lapuyade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · DTP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Lapuyade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · DTP TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · GTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teri Hetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · DTP TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · DTP TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with KRISTEN ALIX
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · DTP TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · DTP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robyn Frahm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · DTP TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Soudabeh Kargar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · DTP TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
61.5%
72W–45L · 52.8% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer