← Search

Jennifer Bogert

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 50W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Bogert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-24 · GTC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ginny Crise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-17 · GTC NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-03 · GTC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · LTC-M PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Elmquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · LTC-M PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Klug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · CP RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Shrensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · LTC-M PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JANE PARIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · GTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Crise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · LTC-M PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · GTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Geiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-03 · CP RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teri Hetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-01 · LTC-M PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Klug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
46.3%
25W–29L · 50.7% of games
3.5
14.1%
9W–55L · 32.7% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.3% of games
7.0
29%
9W–22L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
17%
27 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert