← Search

Kelli Schmidt

— year-end
174 matches · 92W–82L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kelli Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gretchen Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · Helsper/HCP/Foothills Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeAnna Finger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Place
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Place/PC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kip Place mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeAnna Finger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Haughney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams65 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 46.9% of games
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 56.3% of games
4.0
41.7%
20W–28L · 46.5% of games
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.5% of games
7.5
57.1%
20W–15L · 53.4% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 13.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert