← Search

Buffy Ransom

Englewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 32W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Buffy Ransom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CCV GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · CCV GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Shepard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · CCV GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shanna Landin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · CCV GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Anema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · CCV PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Shepard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · CCV PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · CCV PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · CCV PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Shepard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-08-18 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Duggan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-11 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Anema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-08-04 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-07-28 · CCV RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
43.2%
32W–42L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#1 Singles
26%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe