← Search

Ellen Leher

Englewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 84W–58L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ellen Leher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · EM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Leher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · EM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Leher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · EM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim McWhite mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · EM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Leher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · CCV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Salwisz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Leher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Leher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 55.4% of games
2.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 67.3% of games
3.0
57.1%
44W–33L · 54.4% of games
5.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe