← Search

Sharen Hayden

— year-end
129 matches · 58W–71L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sharen Hayden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-22 · KY/LOU/JORDAN/ MOORE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/JONES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Kellerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/JONES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Kellerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · KY/LOU/MOORE/MARQUETTE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Coan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alice Calhoun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · KY/Lou//Dicks/Melhuish · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tony Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · KY/LOU/MOORE/MARQUETTE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Coan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-01 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lillian Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-13 · KY/LOU/MOORE/SHIVELY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Chou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · KY/LOU/LANE/PRZEWORSKI · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Marquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · KY/LOU/LANE/PRZEWORSKI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Curtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/PRZEWORSKI/LANE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Shade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Teams79 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
50%
40W–40L · 49.8% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 35.5% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.8% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 41.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 29.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe