← Search

Jill Reiner

Schnecksville, PA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 4W–14L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Jill Reiner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Lentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Zapf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audra Delconte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwin Krouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 1-0
W
2022-11-11 · Sweet Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Greaser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Pigga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Westhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2021-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darla Antonis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanen Hoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanen Hoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanen Hoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2021-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Westhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 41.4% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert