← Search

Catherine Quigley

Royersford, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 125W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Quigley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
Carolyn Strong / Ann Rizzo
2026-07-08 · Miller Time Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Advantage Deuces Wild · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Weckerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Miller Time Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Beach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · Miller Time Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doris Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · Advantage Deuces Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Weckerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Miller Time Too · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · Advantage Deuces Wild · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Pergine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-18 · Net Ninjas 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Laura Walsh / Emily Denney
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Sharon Bartle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Brenda Weckerly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Marisa Grotell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-12-04 · Net Ninjas 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77.6%
97W–28L · 60.4% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal