← Search

Jen Suh McCormack

Bayport, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 43W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jen Suh McCormack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-02-01 · Blue Point, Casamassima/Fallon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Dulberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-20 · Blue Point, Casamassima/Fallon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Dulberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-27 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Hellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-17 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Hellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Hellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-01-05 · Blue Point, Fallon/Casamassima · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Bindler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-12-15 · Blue Point, Siegmund · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Mertz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-10-20 · Blue Point, Fallon/Casamassima · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Dulberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-18 · Blue Point, Siegmund · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Mertz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-25 · Blue Point, Cifelli/Fishbane · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Ciserano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-07-22 · Blue Point, Cifelli/Fishbane · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Leggio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-06 · Bluepoint, Fallon/Casamassima · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Dulberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.3% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert