← Search

Tara Sisneros

Broomfield, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 47W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tara Sisneros to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
Whitney Jones / Xenia Rutherford
2026-08-31 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Koechel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-10 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Howlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · BTA-C ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Rudolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Howlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-25 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirby Mcilyar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
47.9%
45W–49L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova