← Search

Megan Rudolph

Longmont, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 60W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan Rudolph to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-31 · BTA-IBM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steffani Hafner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · BTA-IBM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · BTA-IBM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Mortenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Christine Atkinson / Jennifer Pearson
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kirby Mcilyar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · BTA-IBM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirby Mcilyar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-05 · BTA-C ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · BTA-IBM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · BTA-C ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Sisneros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · BTA-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Mortenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Ann Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Zacharewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · BTA-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Mortenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
61.2%
60W–38L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer