← Search

Emma Barinas-Mitchell

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 27W–31L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Emma Barinas-Mitchell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
Kaitlyn Walch / Riley Gordish
2024-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Rachel Holt / Lori Seekely
2024-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Squelch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Ann Schipani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura DeCastro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-2
L
Patrick McDermott / Carrie Golvash
2023-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Marks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Jane Matthews / Margaret Antolik
2023-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Lisa McGrosky-Kleja / Jennifer Fell
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-2
W
Carole McKain / David McKain
2023-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hermes Cordoba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 2-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 68.2% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova