← Search

Lori Seekely

— year-end
91 matches · 37W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lori Seekely to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-18 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Paredes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina DeCola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Guajardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-06-14 · Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hakos-Hruby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · GlenCreek Called to Serve · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-19 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Tannehill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
46.7%
21W–24L · 44.5% of games
7.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
34.4%
11W–21L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams