← Search

Emily Gaud

Louisville, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 34W–34L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Gaud to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-09-03 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-13 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Huntsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · BTA-C RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · BTA-C RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · BRMST BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hamill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · BRMST BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hamill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · BTA-C RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Killion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · BTA-C RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · BRMST TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Huntsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · BTA-C RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.1% of games
3.5
40%
14W–21L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova