← Search

Desiree Slavick

Boulder, CO
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Desiree Slavick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2023-05-23 · MEA NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-25 · MEA NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole McGann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Christine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds
2023-04-18 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-18 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole McGann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2022-07-12 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Blades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-07-11 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Lintukorpi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-27 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole McGann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-06-24 · MEA ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Valerie Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-4, 0-0
W
2022-06-20 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole McGann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-06-13 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2022-06-04 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aileen Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-06-03 · MEA ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lucy Kuchta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 52.4% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer