← Search

Colleen McClary

Arvada, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 98W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colleen McClary to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
L
2026-09-12 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-01 · NJ GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lochner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-04 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bonczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · RHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · RHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Rossano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briana Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · RHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Kacmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60%
30W–20L · 55.6% of games
4.0
44.7%
42W–52L · 47.3% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.7% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#1 Singles
8%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert