← Search

Nancy Pollard

— year-end
22 matches · 7W–15L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Nancy Pollard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2021-09-22 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-09-03 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2021-08-25 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2019-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Keys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2019-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Sharon Barton / Margaret Henderson
2019-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie O Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2019-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Coccaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Julie Jones / Jody Neuman
2019-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2019-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Karen Freed / Nancy McNally
2019-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Castleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer