← Search

Catherine Clark

Park City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 50W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-09-08 · PC MARC-Alexander/Levin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · PC MARC-Alexander/Levin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Dell'Orco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · PC MARC-Alexander/Levin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Baber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Baber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Megan Alexander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Pfeiffer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Park City MARC-Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Megan Alexander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 52.7% of games
4.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 37.6% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 49% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer