← Search

Sarah Ward

Sylvania, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
386 matches · 210W–176L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Sarah Ward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history386 matches
L
Ashley Gastin / Cindy Gamby
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Nixon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Perin Goodman / Susan Eberlein
2026-08-07 · #4 Doubles · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Jennifer Smith / Delia Perry
2026-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson/Kraus-SVC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Ann Miller / Amy Spero
2026-07-02 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson/Kraus-SVC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Nisbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson/Kraus-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
36W–18L · 56.3% of games
4.0
52.9%
91W–81L · 53.4% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
7.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 55.5% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
45.8%
22W–26L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
133 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
101 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
73 matches
#1 Singles
11%
43 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer