← Search

Cynthia Flores-Rae

WEST CHESTER, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
291 matches · 193W–98L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Flores-Rae to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history291 matches
W
2026-02-20 · Queen City Orange · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
MacKenzie Hammel / Allison Sayles
2026-02-13 · Queen City Orange · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugenie Kreutzjans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Jana Monzel / Kathleen Adams
2025-06-10 · Harpers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-03-14 · Harpers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisela Amaya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-02-07 · Harpers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-06 · Camargo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Longbottom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-11-08 · Camargo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dara Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-01 · Camargo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Kennebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-11 · Camargo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dara Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-02 · Harpers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Trippet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-06-25 · Harpers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerry Ellensohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 4-0
W
2024-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.9%
93W–28L · 62.7% of games
4.0
41.9%
18W–25L · 44.7% of games
6.5
86.4%
38W–6L · 67.4% of games
7.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
66 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer